My jan 25, 2012 email to Rep. Doug Lamborn regarding his boycott of the president's SOTU

Regarding your boycott of President Obama's SOTU:

I am totally disgusted. I'm not a democrat (or republican), but, well, one person's comment sums it up for me:

"I'm glad to see that our representative has a closed mind about the president’s speech. That's the problem with politics in this country, all our politicians have closed minds. That's why we'll never be better as a country. Different parties will always have different ideas for what's best for the country."

You represent COLORADO constituents-not yourself.  You represent ALL of your constituents, not just the ones you deem worthy, and you have sorely and publicly misrepresented your constituents.

You're not leading this country or even your own state-and you should all be fired for focusing on your own PERSONAL agendas, and for selectively choosing which constituents you're going to work for, choosing only those who you deem worthy..

In addition, YOU all set up OUR president for failure by refusing to do YOUR jobs. Rather than doing your job and working together to find real solutions for America, you're too busy trying to crucify a man who simply wants to do his best for this country. I'm not a democrat, but I'm really sick and tired of republicans who are just as monstrous tyrants as religious fanatics focused on trying to force their ideals and agendas on other Americans rather than finding out what the collective desires are of ALL constituents and working for ALL your constituents cooperatively with all members in Washington.

Dec 2011 email to Members of the Iowa House Eighty-Fourth General Assembly House 100

I am both an ordained minister and a member of my current city’s planning commission, among other things, and I am appalled.  And you should be ashamed.  I cannot fathom how anyone thinks they have the moral right to dictate the private life of another.  I can’t believe your constituents are paying you to meddle in their private lives and waste their tax dollars on such ugly legislation.

This is so horrible to me, that some people are really no different than Hitler or other extremists, in that they think they’re better than another group of people, in this case, gays, and not only think they have more moral value, but that they have the right to control or dictate the lives of that group, in this case, dictating the marriage decisions/abilities for this group.  You are no different than Hitler.  Heinous and horrible. As public officials, you should know that you answer to ALL your constituents, because some of that target group are also your taxpayers and constituents. Christianity (or any other religion) doesn’t have a monopoly on morality. This behavior from anyone is so cruel, especially public officials, elected by the people, promoting discrimination and hatred rather than compassion and acceptance.  Are you aware that Iowa has six recognized hate groups? And your behavior fuels their horrible hate-mongering discrimination and lack of tolerance. As public officials, your job is to keep and protect ALL of your constituents, not just the ones you deem worthy.

Family is determined by love and kinship. Why would you deny that to anyone?

This behavior from anyone, let alone a public official is so cruel, promoting discrimination and hatred. Now you have the opportunity to promote compassion and acceptance, or at least tolerance. I’m sure you have seen this letter to Senate Majority Leader Amy Koch, but it bears a re-read, because it is unconstitutional for anyone to think they can dictate the private lives of another. http://blogs.citypages.com/blotter/2011/12/gay_marriage_amy_koch_michael_brodkorb.php

 It may not be long before your constituents are suing your state for unethical violation of constitutional rights as citizens: http://www.lgbtqnation.com/2011/12/appeals-court-rejects-anti-gay-graduate-students-bid-for-reversal-of-her-expulsion.

‎"the U. S. District Court judge wrote, “The record suggests, and the testimony at the hearing bolsters, the Plan was imposed because Plaintiff exhibited an inability to counsel in a professionally ethical manner — that is, an inability to resist imposing her moral viewpoint on counselees – in violation of the ACA Code of Ethics.”" 

Cc: President Barrack Obama

My email to Troy, MI Mayor Daniels regarding

Dear Mayor Daniels,

I want to speak to you regarding your Facebook post “I think I'm going to throw away my 'I Love New York' carrying bag now that queers can get married there."  I am both an ordained minister and a member of my current city’s planning commission, among other things, and I am appalled. 

As a public official selected by your constituents, your freedom of speech is limited. You’re entitled to your opinion, but you are judging many of your very own constituents, many of whom may have elected you. You (or any other hate-mongerer) do not have the monopoly on morality, and if anything, this makes you even less moral.  You have no more value as a person than any of the gay/lesbian group you are judging.  You can define marriage one way for your life, but you have no right to define marriage for any other human.  Did you know that the state of Michigan is a state with one of the highest rates of hate groups in the country? More than 30 active hate groups exist in Michigan currently, and your behavior fuels their horrible hate-mongering discrimination and lack of tolerance. As a public official, your job is to keep and protect ALL of your constituents, not just the ones you deem worthy.  This is part of the reason my family and I will never move back to Michigan. I do not ever want to be associated with such hatred, and I would never allow my children to grow up thinking that this is normal or acceptable, for it is not. 

This behavior from anyone, let alone a public official is so cruel, promoting discrimination and hatred.  Now you have the opportunity to promote compassion and acceptance, or at least tolerance.

everyone can appreciate this pic, especially animal lovers

..regardless of your religious or spiritual beliefs:

my Facebook message and email (respectively) to WI Representatives Steineke and Petersen regarding "christmas tree"

Dear Mr. _______,


as a minister, a City Planning Commissioner, and a former Wisconsin resident, I would like to address the issue of the use of christmas versus holiday regarding the tree. I understand this is a tremendously sensitive matter for many people of all belief systems, so please bear with me. This matter can set a precedent for other communities and states.

First, there is no official state menorah or festivus pole but there is an official state tree.

Many of us, christian and nonchristian, put up the tree because of the holiday season, and many of us call it a christmas tree. That the state needs to legislate its name is unreasonable since we all know what it is, and I doubt that any taxpayer is paying you or anyone else to legislate this, given the state of our economy. Government should not endorse any particular religion. Government works, you work, for everyone, not just a particular majority.
The evergreen originated as a pagan symbol during the holidays, as did many other practices that are part of this holiday, and therefore, the tree is not just a christian symbol, though many in this country would like to believe.

This country was NOT founded on christian principles. this country is the melting pot, and if you truly look at history, the founding fathers promoted secularism for a reason. A quarter of this country are not christian, and thus, do things differently. You work for all of your constituents, regardless of their religious affiliation (or lack there-of).
Although many celebrate christmas, including millions of non-christians, consider this fact: Look throughout the pages of the bible, and you will find not ONE WORD of "christmas" being celebrated by any of YEHOVAH's people. It is not mentioned once! Neither the messiah nor any apostles ever observed this holiday, nor the new testament church!
Roman pagans first introduced the holiday of saturnalia, a week long period of lawlessness celebrated between December 17-25.
In the 4th century CE, christianity imported the saturnalia festival hoping to take the pagan masses in with it. Christian leaders succeeded in converting to christianity large numbers of pagans by promising them that they could continue to celebrate the saturnalia as christians. Review your history books on Constantine I.

The problem was that there was nothing intrinsically christian about saturnalia. To remedy this, these christian leaders named saturnalia’s concluding day, December 25th, to be Jesus’ birthday.

Just as early christians recruited Roman pagans by associating christmas with the saturnalia, so too worshippers of the Asheira cult and its offshoots were recruited by the church sanctioning “Christmas Trees”.

That said, at the end of the day it's about acceptance, or at the very least, tolerance of everyone around us. No one should have to feel defensive, about how they express simple things, like stating merry christmas or happy holidays.

As a minister, I promote acceptance and inclusiveness, to say that EVERYONE should look at what is intended when people say things. If I say happy holidays to you, that is my way of wishing something positive to you, and if you say merry christmas to me, that is your way of wishing something positive to me. It is all intent, and I believe that's what we need to look for. We need to look deeper into the people around us.

Many people, christian and nonchristian, celebrate something during this time of the year. It may have a different meaning for each person, and that's ok. We need to promote understanding and acceptance.

I encourage you to look at this matter from all angles, for all of your constituents, not just what you consider to be the majority. And then take measures toward inclusiveness. Majorities are not supposed to receive preferential treatment at the expense of others.

I am not saying that you personally cannot call it a christmas tree. I am not christian, and I still call it a christmas tree, though its meaning for me may obviously differ from what it means to you. Among my christian friends, I honor their expressions and way of doing things, and among nonchristian friends I also honor their way of expression and doing things. There will always be extremists on any side of an issue, one who says you can't say merry christmas and one who judges a person who uses secular expressions. I honor all, and promote inclusiveness. As a politician, hired by your constituents, you can have your personal beliefs, but your employer, I imagine, wants you to be fair and impartial.

I encourage you to promote understanding and acceptance-hold yourself to a higher standard. Be the one who encourages everyone, christians and nonchristians, to look beyond mere words and objects and doctrines to find deeper meanings. Why does it take atrocities like September 11 to unite this country's citizens?

Sincerely, Happy Holidays, Merry Christmas, Namaste, and Assalam Aleykum

The Provocation: Cain Settlement Money Makes a Mockery of First Amendment.

The Provocation: Cain Settlement Money Makes a Mockery of First Amendment#.TrGMNUdu3W4.facebook#.TrGMNUdu3W4.facebook

Money IS a huge factor here. If you don't want to be bound by a contract (even one requiring you to remain silent on a matter), then don't sign the contract and DO NOT take the money. The victim's acceptance of the money is JUST AS UNETHICAL as the offender's offering of this money. this case has nothing to do with ANY amendment. it has to do with people's choices.

5 Fort Carson Soldiers Injured In Afghanistan - News Story - KRDO Colorado Springs

5 Fort Carson Soldiers Injured In Afghanistan - News Story - KRDO Colorado Springs
One Dead, Two Others Injured In Taliban Attack
SCOTT HARRISONKRDO NewsChannel 13
FORT CARSON, Colo. -- An attack Thursday by Taliban forces in Afghanistan left one man dead and seven others injured, including five Fort Carson soldiers, an Army spokesman confirmed.
The injured soldiers are members of the 2nd Brigade Combat Team. Maj. Kevin Toner, a spokesman for the unit, did not identify the soldiers but said they were hurt Thursday afternoon in the U.S. compound at Camp Nathan Smith in Kandahar province.
Toner said the soldiers, along with an Afghan soldier and an American civilian contractor, are expected to recover from their injuries. An Afghan interpreter died in the attack, Toner said.
In providing details of the attack, Toner said Taliban forces used small-arms fire and rocket-propelled grenades on coalition forces in the camp from a three-story building nearby.
The four-hour battle ended, he said, when a coalition helicopter fired a guided missile into the third floor. Toner said the number of Taliban forces involved in the attack is unclear.
Toner said the Taliban rigged the building with explosives and placed two improvised explosive devices in vehicles that exploded in the camp compound, but the explosions caused no injuries. American forces fought back with machine gun fire from guard towers, Toner said.
Toner said the attack could have been part of a wider offensive against the camp.
''It seemed they had something bigger planned,'' he said.
A key Taliban tactic in the war has been Some military experts say attempts attempts to breach American base defenses have been a key Taliban tactic in the ongoing war, and that similar attacks have occurred in Kabul and in Afghanistan's eastern provinces.
Thursday's attack is one of the largest by the Taliban against the brigade since it arrived in Afghanistan last June.


The love of my life was one of those injured.  He called home to tell me he was ok, but never gave details.  Hours later the Department of the Army called to inform me that he was injured, but ok.